Monday, April 17, 2017

Contracts in a leasing transaction

Leasing Transactions

If you’re a prospective tenant or landlord entering into a leasing transaction then it’s likely that you will be asked to sign a number of different documents. It’s important to understand the differences between each document and how they interact in order to determine which is appropriate for your situation.

  1. Offer To Lease

The first document you’ll commonly be asked to sign is an Offer To Lease. This document is normally prepared by a property agent and sets out a few pages of key terms that will form the foundation of the Lease. These terms usually include the property address and size, rent and annual increases, proportion of outgoings, security bond, whether there will be personal guarantees and any sort of incentive or special conditions. Once the Offer To Lease is signed by the parties, the tenant will usually pay a deposit and the landlord will instruct its solicitors to proceed with preparing the formal Lease.

Whether the Offer To Lease is binding will depend on its terms. The document may expressly say that it is not binding, in which case either party can pull out of the negotiations and the deposit will be refunded. In some cases the document may be binding and entitle the landlord to keep the deposit if the tenant has a change of mind, and perhaps further recourse against the tenant.

  1. Lease

The Lease is the formal document containing all of the agreed terms and conditions for the transaction. It will become binding once it is signed by both parties. Once the Lease commences, a copy is normally lodged with the Land Titles Office to be registered on the property’s Title. The length of the Lease will determine whether registration is required. In a straightforward leasing transaction, the Lease will usually be the final document to be signed.

  1. Agreement For Lease

In some situations, the parties will be required to sign an Agreement For Lease at the same time as signing the Lease. An Agreement For Lease will usually be applicable if there will be a lengthy delay between signing the Lease and the tenant’s occupation of the property commencing, such as when the property is still under construction.

For example, the tenant wishes to lease a shop in a shopping centre which is currently under construction. Because construction is not complete, then the appropriate documents such as the plans for the shop and the centre have not yet been lodged and registered with the Land Titles Registry in order to create legal title to the shop.

By signing the Agreement For Lease, the parties are entering into a validly binding agreement to essentially enter into a Lease once the shop has been constructed and title to the property is created. Once formal title is created, then the landlord will insert the property description into the signed Lease. The Agreement For Lease will usually set out a number of considerations such as:

  1. Plans and specifications. Drafts of these will normally be set out along with the landlord’s ability to modify them.
  1. Preconditions for construction. The construction would normally be subject to a variety of preconditions such as council approval. If a precondition is not met, then the landlord may have the ability to terminate the Agreement and walk away from the transaction without any claim by the tenant.
  1. Timeframes. There will normally be a construction deadline, and if construction is not complete in time, then the parties may have the ability to terminate the Agreement.
  1. Fitout requirements or contributions. The Agreement For Lease may state whether the landlord or tenant will be responsible for fitting out the shop, along with fitout specifications and who will own the fitout. The landlord may also be providing a fitout contribution to the tenant.

If a condition of the Agreement For Lease is not fulfilled which leads to its termination, then a legally binding Lease will not come into effect. The landlord is then usually free to lease the property to another tenant.

4. Incentive Deed

If the landlord is providing the tenant a fitout contribution, rent-free period or some other form of incentive to enter into the Lease, then the details may be included within an Incentive Deed. Whilst such incentives can be contained in the Lease or an Agreement For Lease, in some situations a separate Incentive Deed may be appropriate. The main reason for this is normally to maintain confidentiality.

Because a Lease is registered with the Land Titles Office, anyone can carry out a search and obtain a copy of the Lease (for a fee). The landlord may have special arrangements with different tenants and not want other tenants to know about the incentive. An Incentive Deed will not form part of the public record and will often have a confidentiality provision preventing the tenant from disclosing the incentive details to anyone other than the tenant’s legal or financial advisors.

  1. Disclosure Statements

If the Lease is a retail Lease, then there will be mandatory disclosure statements to be signed by both the landlord and tenant, as well as the tenant’s legal and financial advisers. It’s vital to ensure the details in these statements are correct. In certain cases the tenant could have the ability to terminate the Lease early, or the tenant may not be released from the terms of the Lease if they were to assign the Lease to a new tenant.

Conclusion

You may find yourself in a situation where you are presented with a combination, or all, of these documents. Always remember that in many cases these documents are legally binding and have serious consequences for non-compliance. It’s always better to err on the side of caution and obtain advice from an experienced leasing lawyer before signing on the dotted line, especially before signing an Offer To Lease.

Need further information about retail shop leases or other aspects of commercial law in Australia? Contact the experts at Rouse Lawyers today.

Monday, April 3, 2017

Mundine/Green Facebook Live Copyright Controversy

Facebook Live Streaming

In February 2017, the much anticipated Mundine/Green fight took place.  This long-awaited match was expected to be an intense fight between two rivals, however, Australias received more than just one fight when a dispute over copyright emerged between Foxtel, the official broadcaster, and two Facebook users.

It is alleged, that approximately 300,000 people viewed the fight via Facebook’s live-streaming service when the two men streamed the fight through their Facebook accounts.  Foxtel, being the official broadcaster, alleges that the streaming of the fight violates their copyright as they held the exclusive rights to air the fight. Foxtel threatened legal action against the Facebook users.

The unofficial follow-up fight, however, did not last long as the two Facebook users issued public apologies the following week.

So why did the streaming of the fight cause such a disagreement?

Copyright law in Australia

Copyright law has a long history in Australia.  Within the area of intellectual property law, copyright is one of the few rights bestowed automatically.  This means that unlike trade marks or patents, the person or company seeking the legal protection afforded by copyright law does not need to apply or be approved, it simply exists over the published work.

As the rightful owner or creator of the work, you get to decide how and whom may re-publish your work. In the case of Foxtel, the organiser chose Foxtel to exclusively broadcast the fight.  This means that Foxtel was the only entity that had permission to air the fight.  Foxtel argues that streaming the fight is the same as broadcasting and therefore when the two men streamed the fight, they were violating Foxtel’s exclusive rights.

Live-streaming Services

Whether you view Foxtel’s actions as extreme or not, the potential legal issues relating to live-streaming will make headlines again as the service becomes more popular.

While this situation highlights the negative of live-streaming, live-streaming services do offer many benefits for businesses and companies who are looking to build their brand awareness or ‘connect’ with customers in ways that traditional print marketing does provide for.

If you are considering using live-stream services it is important that you understand the terms of service (or the rules) to avoid unnecessary legal issues.

Know your rights

When you sign up to a service that offers live-streaming (e.g. Facebook), there will be terms and conditions that govern how you can use the service including provisions about what you are allowed to stream and what you are not allowed to stream.

With all the major streaming platforms, the terms and conditions do state that you are not to do any action that will infringe another person’s rights including their copyright.   This generally means, you may not re-broadcast something you did not create or have permission to show.

When things go wrong

The consequence of violating a no-infringing clause is that the platform can disable your account and prevent you from using their service again.   Losing access to your social media accounts on either a temporary or permanent basis can have potential negative consequences to the goodwill of your business as you can no longer interact with your customers.

Limiting your risk

So how can you limit your risks when using live-streaming services?  Below are 5 suggestions to assist in reducing your risk:

  1. Don’t stream or post what you don’t own

Creating original content is the easiest way to avoid unnecessary legal issues.  Host round-tables, conduct interviews or other activities where you are responsible for creating the content.

When you create the content, you are the owner of the copyright, granting you the rights to broadcast.  You can avoid issues when you are in control.

  1. If it’s not yours, it’s not yours

If you didn’t create the content, if you are streaming a TV show, sporting event or concert, there is a chance that you could see legal action brought against you.

Always avoid streaming something you don’t own or have the right to show.

  1. Understand the terms and conditions

Regardless if it is your first time live-streaming for your company or you are seasoned pro, it is important to check the rules relating to how you may use the live-streaming service.  The terms of use published by each live-stream service will state how and what you are allowed to stream and what you are not allowed to stream.  Consult these terms to avoid problems following your broadcast.

  1. Getting caught in the act isn’t the point

Social media platforms operate on a complaint system.  This means platforms generally will only respond after they receive a complaint, this could be during the stream, the following day or even a month later (depending on how long the video is available).  Simply not being stopped during a live-stream does not mean you will not receive a complaint later.

  1. When in doubt, consult a professional

If you are unsure if your marketing plan is up to scratch or simply have questions about using any aspect of social media for your business, seek legal advice.  Here at Rouse Lawyers, we are happy to help at any stage of your plans; from providing advice on a marketing plan or representing you in a copyright infringement, we are here to assist you and your business to reach success.

If you take precaution, you can limit your risks while increasing your customer base.  It’s a win-win for everyone when you follow the rules.

Need further information about this case, or your rights regarding live streaming?  Contact the experts at Rouse Lawyers today on 07 3667 9696

How Do I Protect my ‘Family’ and my ‘Business’ if i get sick?

What if you get sick- (2)

How Do I Protect my ‘family’ and my ‘business’ from Extra Stress and Expense If (or When!) I Get Sick? 

Although we all feel invincible, everybody faces health problems.

The difficulty is in knowing WHEN or HOW that illness will occur, and how it will impact your family, your finances and your business dealings.

What can you do?

  1. Appoint an Attorney for your Business!

WHY?  If you are hospitalized and you can’t make business decisions, your hard work won’t be wasted, an unnecessary delay won’t occur, and critical business decisions can still be made, ensuring your Business continues to work for you, even when you are unwell.

  1. Appoint a ‘personal’ Attorney for yourself, so your family can make personal health decisions when you are unable.

WHY?  Losing capacity is awful, disempowering and very stressful on those left behind.  You can make your own life more comfortable, and reduce the stress on your family, if you allow them to make decisions when you can’t.   For example – where and who you live with, your diet and dress, your treatment for physical or mental conditions.

  1. Make an Advance Health Directive in case of a medical emergency where you cannot make decisions for yourself.

WHY?  To spell out in detail whilst you can exactly what kinds of medical procedures you do or do not want performed on you – what quality versus quantity of life you desire, particularly if you are in palliative care or in a vegetative state.

Avoid the emotional and financial pitfalls of your survivors arguing amongst themselves as to what you ‘would have’ wanted!

If you do get sick, your family will be grateful that you took the time to prepare for an unfortunate event.

Need advice about estate planning or making a will? Contact the experts at Rouse Lawyers today.