Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Business Lawyer Brisbane with Rouse Lawyers

selling a business in queensland

Selling A Business in Queensland – What your Brisbane Business Lawyer Does

When selling your business there are many legal factors to consider, and if you are considering selling your business you should seek advice and guidance from a business lawyer well in advance. A Brisbane based business lawyer will have intimate knowledge of how businesses are valued, and the skillset and expertise to prepare the necessary documentation. Doing these things will help ensure you receive the best possible outcome from the transaction. Skipping this step or trying to negotiate a business contract yourself, without the assistance of a business lawyer, may see your contract fall over, or see you having to deal with unexpected and unwanted problems.

Do I need a business lawyer?

There are many advantages a business lawyer can bring to the table that can assist with the sale of your business. An experienced business lawyer can protect your best interests by providing efficient, strategic advice throughout the entire process.
There are a few key steps involved in selling a business that requires professional advice.

Document preparation

A business lawyer acting on your behalf can provide advice regarding how to structure the sale of your business, and prepare the necessary documentation to ensure that the transaction gives effect to your best interests. It is critical that the terms and conditions of the sale of your Queensland business are set out clearly. A Brisbane business lawyer will be familiar with the overall processes involved in buying and selling local businesses, providing you with confidence that all of the paperwork will be prepared to ensure that the transaction proceeds smoothly.

Transfer duty & taxes

When selling a business in Queensland there are often transfer duty consequences, and knowing the ins and outs of what’s involved calls for an experienced business lawyer. Understanding exactly what your obligations are from the outset is critical, and your business lawyer will work with your accountant to ensure you are receiving the best possible outcome.

Legal obligations

There are a range of legal obligations which arise in every business transaction, and these must be considered and balanced by obtaining legal advice. Employing the services of a team who understand the implications associated with the sale of your business, particularly in Queensland, is essential.
Making the decision to partner with an experienced business lawyer will help ensure your transaction is on the road to success. Our experienced team takes the time to get to know businesses, and what is important to them. By doing this, we understand how to get the best possible result for our clients.

If you are considering selling your Queensland based business, contact one of our business lawyers and make an appointment to discuss your needs today.

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

ESTATE PLANNING MADE SIMPLE

ESTATE PLANNING MADE SIMPLE

If you like to avoid conflict, stress and unnecessary expense – then the importance of a proper estate planning review and suite of documents, cannot be under-estimated.

8 Things to Think About When Considering if Your Estate Plan is Adequate
1 (a) Benefit from your wealth [home, investments, superannuation, trust interests, inheritances, businesses etc] (as opposed to an unworthy beneficiary, ex-spouse, the Australian Taxation Office or Trustee in Bankruptcy)?
2 If you are hospitalized tomorrow, on heavy medication needing a back operation, who will pay your rates, instruct your rental property managers, authorize payment of health insurance accounts to ensure your operation can go ahead or maintain business dealings/contracts?
3 Who among your siblings/parents, spouse or close family friend will decide where you will live, if your pet can stay with you, or other personal care options (religious outings, clothing, accommodation, make-up/hair/shaving) etc?
4 Are you concerned about the pressure your spouse/children will face from in-laws, step-relatives or business partners to liquidate assets that you intended to remain as a capital growth asset for long-term benefit of family?
 5 Do you wish to choose your response to Advanced Health Care queries or leave this to chance?
 6 Have you considered who will care for your minor children if you cannot – and how you can minimize disputes causing them greater distress at a time when they need it least?
 7 Will your superannuation (and accompanying life insurance policy) be available to an ex-de facto’s child? (your step-child, despite separation)
 8 Can your former spouse to whom you pay spousal maintenance gain access to a portion of your estate?

 

If you have not thought of, nor addressed, any of these questions, then the simple answer is that you do not have an adequate Estate Plan (and this is just a sample of the many issues a comprehensive adviser will discuss with you at a Lawyer qualified meeting).

How can you maximize your efforts, minimize potential for family conflict and be a generous benefactor, with ease and simplicity?

  1. Commit an hour of your time with our Estate Planning Lawyer (to save hours of grief to your Family);
  2. Invest in yourself and let us educate you on the Key Estate Planning Documents necessary to fulfill your goals;
  3. Receive a clear Considered Plan and Fixed Fee Quote;
  4. Benefit from our 360o approach, without the bloated overheads of a CBD Firm or Client Service Managers; and
  5. Let our Approachable Team draft a suite of documents to answer your Estate Planning Goals, and allow you to focus on building your wealth and family relationships.

Tammy Parsons is a qualified, experienced Estate Planning lawyer. Contact Tammy for helpful advice about making a will.

WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DIE WITHOUT A WILL?

Need advice about estate planning or making a will? Contact the experts at Rouse Lawyers today.

Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Franchisors beware: Employment laws toughen again!

Franchisors Beware

On 5 September 2017, the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Bill 2017 passed through parliament. When enacted into law, this legislation will have massive ramifications on the franchising industry.

Under the existing laws, a franchisor may potentially be held to be liable for a franchisee’s breach of workplace laws if the franchisor is involved in the contravention.

Along with increasing maximum penalties for employers who deliberately breach minimum wage and entitlement obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009, the proposed new legislation will hold franchisors and holding companies responsible for underpayments by their franchisees or subsidiaries if the franchisor knew, or reasonably should have known, about the contravention and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it. This greatly expands on the current laws.

The controversial Bill has been heavily debated within the Australian franchise industry, predominantly because in many franchise models the franchisee operates its business independently from the franchisor, who is removed from the day-to-day running of the business such as paying wages and rent, which is the responsibility of the franchisee. The legislation will only apply to franchisors who have a significant degree of influence or control over the affairs of their franchisees. How this influence or control will be assessed is yet to be determined.

Triggered in response to the highly publicised 7-Eleven employee underpayment scandal which has engulfed the franchise sector since 2015, along with several recent employee underpayments by Domino’s and Caltex franchisees, the franchise-specific provisions of the new laws will take effect 6 weeks after the Bill receives royal assent (or in other words, when the legislation becomes enforceable law).

Turning a blind eye is no longer an option for franchisors, who must now pay closer attention to how their franchisees manage employment processes. Franchisors should take this opportunity to:

  1. review their standard form Franchise Agreements and Operations Manuals to clearly set out franchisee obligations under workplace laws;
  1. consider whether to include employee obligations in initial or ongoing training programs provided to franchisees;
  1. consider and revise any policies and resources provided to franchisees covering obligations under workplace laws;
  1. monitor franchisees, and if warranted, carry out compliance audits to determine if employees are being paid under the correct award, and correct entitlements such as superannuation and leave. Regular audits may act as a deterrent to other franchisees who will be aware that audits are commonplace and that consequences for non-compliance with employment laws are enforced;
  1. encourage feedback as both franchisees and their employees should feel comfortable approaching a franchisor in respect to issues with the system. Employees should not feel that they are prevented from raising employment concerns with the franchisor;
  1. listen to concerns that franchisees raise regarding the system and don’t ignore issues. It is in the best interests of franchisors to ensure that franchisees are operating their businesses adequately. If franchisees are struggling to pay their employees the proper entitlements, and if this is a widespread concern, that could indicate the need to review the structure of the franchise system; and
  1. treat franchisees with uniformity. Franchisors could be accused of breaching their good faith obligations under the Franchising Code of Conduct if they single out a particular franchisee. If audits are to be carried out and consequences for non-compliance enforced, then all franchisees must be treated equally.

Franchisees and franchisors will need to be prepared to face tougher penalties for breaching employment laws. In some cases the penalties for contravening employment laws will now be up to $630,000 for corporations and $126,000 for individuals per offence. The legislation also brings increased penalties for breaching record-keeping and payslip requirements. “Cash-back” arrangements where an employer delivers a wage to a worker but then asks for part of it to be repaid will also be specifically outlawed.

Depending on the provisions of the particular Franchise Agreement, underpayment of employees may constitute fraudulent conduct in certain circumstances, entitling a franchisor to immediately terminate a Franchise Agreement, or at the very least, acting as grounds for a breach notice to be issued.

If you have any concerns about the underpayment of employees or questions about the proposed new laws, Talk to the Franchising team at Rouse Lawyers. Contact us today!

 

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

MAIN RESIDENCES IN ESTATE PLANNING – CAUTION REQUIRED

MAIN RESIDENCES IN ESTATE PLANNING

The use of testamentary trusts in estate planning (particularly for clients with a reasonable level of income producing investments) is relatively standard practice. It is not uncommon in preparing the Will to pass all of the assets of the testator into one or more testamentary trusts.

The tax advantages of testamentary trusts are obvious – distributions to minors are not restricted to a $416 limit as applies to discretionary trusts, as well as the income splitting advantages of discretionary testamentary trusts. Of greater importance are the asset protection advantages that a properly designed testamentary trust can provide.

What is often ignored, however, is the special position of main residences under the tax legislation. A complete exemption from any capital gains subject to a number of conditions – the key condition is the disposing owner is an individual that has used the property as their main residence.

CGT on deceased estates

Example Bruce and Fleur purchased their home in 1992 for a cost of $170,000. The property is held as tenants in common. Throughout the period of ownership they have used it exclusively as their main residence. It now has a value of $1,020,000, and after reduction by costs associated with sale, a capital gain of $800,000 is expected. They are now 73 years of age and executed their Will which passes their interest in the home, together with other income producing assets, into a Testamentary Trust initially controlled by the survivor. Shortly afterwards, Bruce passes away.

The general rule is that post-CGT assets (assets acquired on or after 20 September 1985) passing into a deceased estate are deemed to have been acquired at the cost base of the testator. The Main Residence Exemption is extended if the property is sold within two years of death.

But what of the situation where the property passes to a testamentary trust? A trustee is generally not eligible for the Main Residence Exemption.

Special Cost Base Rules

Division 128 alters the standard cost base rules above in nominated circumstances.

One special cost base rule applies where the property was the main residence of the deceased immediately before they died and was not then being used to produce assessable income. In that instance, instead of adopting the deceased cost base, the cost base is equal to its market value. On the other hand, the dwelling were used to produce assessable income at the date of death (for example, by the rental of a room) the cost base would be $85,000 (½ of $170,000), which could give rise to a capital gain of $315,000 if sold immediately after death. A death tax?

Exemption for deceased estates

The rules in respect of the Main Residence Exemption provide a full exemption for post-CGT dwellings if it was a deceased’s main residence just before death and not being used to produce assessable income at that time (use prior to death is not taken into account). It applies to pre-CGT dwellings irrespective of use prior to death.

The full exemption is available where the dwelling is sold within two years of death, or the dwelling is used throughout the period after death by the deceased’s spouse, a person with a right of occupation under the Will, or the beneficiary to whom the dwelling passes under the Will.

Importantly, the exemption not only applies to an individual but also to the trustee of a deceased estate. Although it might be considered that the term “trustee of a deceased estate” is limited to the legal personal representative, the ATO accepts that the trustee of a testamentary trust satisfies that description (ATO ID 2006/34) which is consistent with its long-standing practice in PSLA 2003/12 to treat the trustee of a testamentary trust in the same way as a legal personal representative for CGT.

A key planning point is if the dwelling is being used as the Main residence of a person other than the spouse, a right of occupation must be provided by the Will.

Failing the conditions: if the property is not sold within two years and not used as a main residence by the people described above, a partial exemption is available. But in that instance any period when the dwelling was not the deceased’s main residence is taken into account to reduce the exemption.

Replacement Residences

In the event that the property were sold and a replacement residence acquired, the above exemption would not apply to the replacement residence.

On the other hand, if the original dwelling had passed to an individual who sold it and acquired a replacement residence, the replacement residence would be eligible.

A less-known provision, (Section 118-210) extends the Main Residence Exemption to the trustee of a deceased estate that acquires a dwelling for occupation by an individual. With appropriate drafting of the Will and putting in place appropriate processes to demonstrate the dwelling is acquired for occupation by an individual, this provision extends the Main Residence Exemption to a replacement residence.

As outlined above, the ATO accepts that the trustee of a testamentary trust is a trustee of a deceased estate to qualify for this exemption.

Pass to Spouse

Some may be dubious about the ATO continuing to stand by its long-standing practice and for greater certainty the best option is simply to pass the interest in the residence to the survivor. What must not be overlooked is that such a gift would then be subject to any claims that might be made against the surviving spouse (loss of asset protection benefits). Additional processes must be implemented in that case to preserve the asset protection benefits of a suitably drafted testamentary trust.

The Take-Away

When implementing estate planning the Main residence of the deceased’s should receive special attention to enable access to the Main Residence Exemption on a subsequent sale during the lifetime of the survivor, and the asset protection benefits of a properly designed testamentary trust.

In particular, drafting a suitable form of right of occupation within the terms of the Will is recommended.

If passing the residence to a spouse, additional processes are required.

NOTE: This article is for general information only and should not be relied upon without first seeking advice from one of our specialist solicitors.

Need advice ? Talk to the Tax & Superannuation Team at Rouse Lawyers. Contact us today!